Ok Seeing the With some of the additions we are likely moving to a 4-3.
Â
Question is..... Do we have enough LBs to do this. We only have 4 on the roster. Â
I think this is a set up to have a all off draft next year. Wr TE and ol for everyone... the ozzie pick tj yeldon in the 1st
I hope not. The 3-4 works well for us
It looks more and more like it
Lets get ASJ now ![]()
Horrid pick ozzie
Get me a center Ozzie
Yes !!!!!!
Haha, I just realized the Ravens have 4 Smiths on the roster, now!
Championship
Where my Smith signing
Tony Gonzalez got released. Seems like a nice safety blanket to add alongside Pitta.
Lol he hung it up
We don't have a well rounded TE as it is, so adding Daniels would not change that. Are you saying you would rather see us pass on Daniels and grab someone else (FA or draft) who is well rounded?
Draft ASJ or the ND TE
I would be all for this. We would have to get Daniels on the cheap, especially after Pitta's deal. But Daniels might want to be under Kubiak and Flacco - he could really thrive. We could have the best TE tandem in the league.
But then we'd have 2 pass catching TEs and not 1 rounded TE
Come on panthers cut smith you know you wanna
Now for D smith and to start worrying about torrey. Since jimmy has a 5th year option.
Just tag him and lets move on to D Smith
That's what it seems likeAfter seeing what the Dolphins did with Ellerbe last year and the news that they're expected to persue Monroe, Ozzie said "Screw that. Cut Jameel & Vonta. We're going to war"
we only would end up losing one draft pick if we don't resign him right? since we more than likely would get a 3rd or 4th round compensation pick for him in 2015?
Yea but think of it like this what the likelihood that Joe dosent have a quality blind side if we don't go 4 Monroe ?
85-90% ?
Wats fair value ? 8.5-9 ?
John doesn't care......
4 int for Ed since no way our Oline will handle Wilkerson,Richardson, and Copules. that front 3 or 4 is beastÂ
Please god I mean Ozzie
in Ravens Talk
Posted · Report post
sarcasm lol. As seen by Yeldon in the 1stÂ