gametyme

Members
  • Content count

    237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

1 Follower

About gametyme

  • Rank
    Rookie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Maryland

Recent Profile Visitors

2,898 profile views
  1. Is there a defensive playmaker left for us to find, a really mean, nasty, choir boy with attitude and heart playmaker....our modern day Ravens def like the choir boy types so they make take him. But we need some un-choir boy like attitudes on our D, I hope they get 5 of those in the 4th
  2. Ugh man, I was afraid of that,
  3. Is he the first round talent DeCosta said we would still get today?
  4. Defensive playmaker please
  5. IMHO Jack > 5th rounder
  6. This^ exactly my opinion too
  7. IMHO I def take the risk on Jack at 36, no question in my mind. Be no different than Authur Brown if it don't work out but if it does work out Jack will be off the charts good.
  8. I'm 100% cool with Stanley pick but man is it me or has such a high draft pick ever seemed so underwhelming or meh. I think it's because I had my heart set on a defensive baller and to see how close we were to Ramsey and it not happen. I think and hope Stanley will have a long healthy pro bowl filled career.
  9. From what I read the only issues with Stanley is the questioning of his desire and heart. I hope that's false, the one thing this team needs is heart.
  10. This ^ is the best ive read in a while.
  11. I would like to see the Ravens get a defensive stud at 6 and hold off on the OL, and I just don't see this FO drafting a WR in the first round two years in a row.
  12. I don't know enough about the prospects to chose one I like more than another, I would just like to get a defensive stud with attitude, heart and toughness.
  13. Thank you! I thought that was the case. It seems then that the defense should commit whatever penalty that keeps the pass from being complete in that situation, saves them 4 points and the penalty is really moot.
  14. Question here I hope someone can shed light on. The play at the end of the second half where the Oakland defender interfered or held SSS so he couldn't make the catch for the TD, and the clock ran down to 3 seconds left forcing us to kick the field goal. My question is if the clock would have ran to zero would they put time back on the clock because a half cannot end on a defensive penalty? Or is that not the case at all. That situation presents some interesting senerios, and the defensive penalty actually works in the defenses favor the way it happened yesterday.