The overreaction in these comments is crazy. Mallett definitely showed a command of the offense, a poise, and a level of throwing ability that Clausen and Schaub don't have that showed he is the best choice to be the backup next year. But some of you are actually insane in thinking this could cause a 'QB controversy'. There are many reasons why Aiken and some other guys have played better since Flacco went down, and also why we may have played better LAST WEEK with Mallett than if Flacco was playing. Teams have had zero gamefilm on our offense since Flacco was injured, because we've been playing a new quarterback, different group of receivers, new offensive line combination, and some new backs each week. That will lead to disasters, and occasionally, if those players play well, it can lead to a win. Think about a finals series in basketball. There are players who can shut down other players, and teams that can beat other teams, in one game. But those same teams would have no chance in a 7 game series. Mallett was great Sunday, Pees gameplan was great, and the receivers were good, but if we played Pittsburgh another 5 times with that same personnel, we're not winning 3 out of 5. You see backup quarterbacks come in all the time and win a game, and Mallett is one of the most talented in the league, but the biggest difference between starters and backups is consistency, not talent, which is why we hear that guys like Kirk Cousins, Brian Hoyer, amd Ryan Fitzpatrick (prior to this year) are great/terrible every other week. Flacco, when given protection (and Mallett was protected very well) good receivers, and a decent running game, is an excellent quarterback