purpletide

Members
  • Content count

    269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by purpletide

  1. I've heard we're possibly going to take him back. Heard the same about Webb, which I'd also love to have back.
  2. Yeah he's our equivalent to "Mr. Irrelevant" with the success we've had with UDFAs
  3. I'm not sure how I feel about him, but I think people do believe that our need at WR is much more dire than it actually is. We have young guys that are still developing and were halted by injuries, and there's guys in the draft that can fit us just fine. Unless Matthews is something that brings something to the table that we don't have or can't get in the draft, I don't think we need him.
  4. 3 DBs is an interesting approach, but I like this mock. I guess the 6th round is where we're the most flexible though.
  5. I'm still not convinced that we're taking Ross in any situation.
  6. Yeah that's the problem we have with making Lewis fill in at RT, not going G to T but going left to right. I think Cam would be much better at guard because of his struggles with speed getting around him but that's not as much of a problem once he gets into the NFL.
  7. We'll probably go BPA in the first round which won't be Baker but if no one slides, probably Tim Williams or Humphrey unless we trade back. We're probably more likely to go Peppers than Baker if we're looking at it from the perspective you give.
  8. OK. The only guys I'd actually heard a little about were Robinson and Lamp.
  9. What C do you suggest we take in the draft? I haven't really looked into any.
  10. I agree, I'd love to see us picking up Foster as a slider, but I could see the exact same stance from all the teams before us. They could just as easily be thinking "ooh look at who fell to us" even if he isn't that far from where he's likely to go.
  11. Plus a possible slider for us is Foster. But I'll stop making this about college preference, they're just the safe picks on our board
  12. Plus that's how his offense works. His QB has 43 TDs in just that season.
  13. Yeah I'm from Bama so I'd like to see them all wearing purple and black. I do legitimately see it being any of the three unless a good player slides or we trade back, most likely Tim.
  14. I don't like Wagner over Williams considering what Wagner was payed. Sure we payed Williams A LOT, and Wagner's a great player, but RT is the least important position on the O-line. Ozzie's probably pretty confident in what we've got or what we can get.
  15. I think it's Tim if we don't get any sliders if I'm honest, but I don't count any others out and we could trade back. I like TJ but I'm not too sure he's our guy at 16, and I haven't seen enough of Harris to say the same but people don't seem to see him as better than Tim.
  16. OK then that's a no from me. I like what I've seen but I think 1-3 is prime O-line drafting and we're probably going BPA in the first
  17. I think Carr opens up our draft WAY more than Claiborne would've. Carr's a solid starter without missing any games and Claiborne would require us to look for a guy that would have to start instantly in a pinch cause of how likely it would be that either Claiborne or Jimmy go down. Carr allows us to be more confident that we could give a CB time to develop before having to throw him at the wall and seeing if he sticks. This allows us to take a BPA much more easily with this need not being as dire.
  18. I also like Kupp, no idea where he's expected to go though. I think Boyle has that skillset that we could utilize at FB, and it allows us to use the depth at TE a little more, especially if we cut Watson.
  19. Yeah, there are a lot of positives to Carr's deal.
  20. Cause he doesn't have the skillset that fits us like Davis' does. We don't need another speed guy alongside Wallace and Perriman he'd basically just have to fight for playing time cause he wouldn't bring anything new to the table. It's not that I don't like him but there's no reason as to why we should grab him, there's so many better directions to go in the draft.
  21. That's why I don't think WR is such an urgent need as people make it out to be. I'd still like one that fits us in the draft, but we've got some potential stars that have been limited at the fault of no one. BTW I think we make Boyle the next FB.
  22. I don't think we're desperate for a WR as much as people think we are, but from a BPA stance I'd love to pick up Davis. If he's not available, nor any other good sliders, I think we go Tim Williams, Marlon Humphrey, or Cam Robinson (which I'm reluctant to say that we'd pick him up, but I'm gradually seeing that it's possible). The most likely being Tim, and I say Humphrey because I think Lattimore will definitely be gone and Wilson will probably be gone as well. I like Humphrey, but I think a lot of things will have to happen to solidify him as a Raven.
  23. It leaves Correa with a fire under his butt to fight for playing time, it's not that I don't like Correa but I see this benefiting him in the long run if it gets him on his heels and to the starting spot. I haven't seen film on Reddick, but if he's what people are saying he is I like him as a pick up if we trade back
  24. I don't know how much cap room we have so can't say much in that regard. But I *think* we still have room for some offensive improvement (problem is I don't know who could bring that improvement) and for instance, with the Carr signing we can do really do anything that we want with how much money he'll get and what best benefits us.
  25. I'd prefer Davis to M. Williams, also more likely to fall to us. Otherwise everyone you brought up I think would be great on the team. Even Howard, sure we're stacked at TE but no one is that athletic.