Your Statement is kind of loosely represented, I'm not sure that calling it Talent is deserved. Lets discuss your power points, I see your objections but some of your points may just be circumstantial and others might be a bit viewed unethical by some in the "sports industry". That is what makes this comparison so interesting. first You use Doom as an example; Ok he came to the Ravens on a bit of a controversy, if you remember. But do really remember why that story received so much press? Because the Patriots were interested in Dumervil. Thats right, they were in the mix, so if the Ravens deal which was described as a "broken fax machine" problem, could have been called back, and then Denver ends up not making a deal it after all, it allows The Patriots to back door the entire situation. ahaaha. this is called the power of high market press. As far Dooms talent it was obviously unchallenged when he came to the team, i would say he may not even be back in 2017, don't be surprised. 2nd - Talent on coaching Staff , there really is not much difference here except that Mr Belichick has the experience and simply has the upper hand when it comes to his assistant coaching staff currently and for the past 9 years. However, The Ravens have 2 Super bowls since 2001 and the Patriots have 3 so the difference in total end game can be argued. 3rd, IF player development were an issue, why do we have the most Pro Bowl selections since 2006 and why do we lose our players to other teams for huge amounts of money? 4th, If the FO is stuck in mediocrity, why would we need to have to draft new players? to replace the sucky ones that no one wanted, but that is not the case? they would still be here from the year before. Somewhere along the line The Ravens would either be Drafting #1's all the time because they have the suckiest team, or they would be firing players for making the pro-bowl. So I think what you are really trying to say is the Patriots have managed to deal well with their "average" players and possibly injuries have not hurt them quite as bad as The Ravens when looking at the timing of contracts. As far as Brady, and the Patriots over all practices..i will just say, there is a clear difference in below 12lbs of air and 13lbs of air in a football.
I will agree with your assessment of roster talent and FO acumen. The Ravens and Patriots draft similarly. They hoard draft picks and believe more picks give you a higher chance of drafting better players. They also draft players that fit their particular scheme. Every once in a while you draft a Richard Seymour or a Marshal Yanda. But because you keep moving back in the draft more often than not, you pick a Segio Kindle or Courtney Upshaw. That is also why the players they have work well for their teams and play poorly for other teams. Pro-Bowl spots mean nothing. No one wants to play in that game. Zuttah was just given the nod for pro-bowl this year and he didn't deserve it. But the biggest differences between the two clubs is coaching and quarterback play. The creativity of the Ravens coaches on offense and defense is laughable when compared to the Patriots. Both staffs have had turnover and the Patriots keep winning and we are losing. Also if you think the air pressure of a football is the difference between Brady and Flacco, you're joking. I don't like the Patriots, but I'm a realist. They work their craft well. The Patriots actually have 4 SuperBowls since 2001 and it may be 5 by next season. The Ravens have 2. So however you look at it, there is no argument regarding the end game, 4>2. The Ravens have to get better. This article lays it out flat. No sugarcoating the facts, get better or be humiliated.