Granted you have some points, but that's why everyone is calling for some type of change to the thought process w/ the offense. Why keep leaning on what's not working (w/ the passing) late in a game when it matters the most when the run game is not only effective but punishing the other team?? Why lean away from what worked in the first half of the game? Are there adjustments happening that us as viewers aren't seeing because it didn't look like Washington could stop West. Do these snaps have anything to do with money? I don't know, all I know is that boy was killing them on the ground and he literally wasn't given the chance to ice the game. That's stupid and completely on the OC.
Baltimore has always been a run first team. Doing that sets up the play action pass & opens everything else up with the passing game because they have to respect the run. All respect due to Joe Flacco, he's a Super Bowl MVP and a great QB but whenever he starts throwing as much as he did yesterday, more often than not the Ravens lose. At this point he is who he is (it's been, what, 8-9 years?) and when you look at when Kubiak was here 2 years ago with the same o-line and wr coaches, (though arguably more talent on the left side of the line), the philosophy he bought w/ the run/pass game is proof that Trestman isn't maximizing the Ravens strengths.
I don't know man but what happened at the end of the game yesterday is inexcusable and is a direct result of play calling which is Trestman's responsibility.
